I do not believe that there is such a thing as an "Old Earth Creationist"... How is that title logical? The scripture clearly says the Geneology and ages of the people in the Bible, Adding shows you the age of the Earth. That in my mind is the reason God gave us the geneology in the Bible, to tell us the age of the Earth!
How do you call yourself a Creationist then, if a Creationist relies on the WORD OF GOD and Science. Just an annoyance that is bothering me greatly and lacks logic.
I am a Creationist (a "C" I guess) I believe that the Universe is young, around 6000 years old. I believe in Creation obviously, 6 days.
This is what I think about Evolution/Evolutiists:
Evolution was put into the school systems... Scopes Trial. A religion that spreads faster and faster, 90 percent at least of the people on this earth including Christians believe the lies.
Evolution is a religion based upon no true factual evidences. Evolution cannot be observed or studied. With that people still call it a Science... Science is observable and evolution is clearly not and never has been. It's a wrong theory. For the Beginning... (which leads to evolution, seems the Big Bang is a popular one, This is ALL taught in school some way or another.) (Angular Momentum: If matter/an object flys off a spinning object, that matter or object spins at the same rotation as the spinning object that that object flew off of.) (layman's terms) I have brung up the Law of Angular Momentum on various other sites and this is what I get: That law only works when no other forces are working upon the matter. What forces would be acting upon the matter in the Big Bang when the only "THING" in the Universe at the time was that matter? Were the forces such as gravity or inertia just there? If that's the case then obviously the "Big Bang" wasn't the Beginning. From the Big Bang's standpoint that is the beginning. Also If man evolved wouldn't many missing links have been found by now with years of work on trying to find fossils and bones being done? I quote from Darwin: "As by this theory innumerable transitional forms must have existed, why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth? The number of intermediate links between all living and extinct species must have been inconceivably great!" Maybe the countless transitional forms dissapeared magically... I'm not waiting for them to be dug up and you shouldn't either, because the missing links don't exist. Obviously you are all brainwashed into thinking the Universe started from nothing, and man evolved over time. That's what years of Science classes and courses will do to you. I'm glad I heard the truth before being suckered in as well, but now all of you have heard so I guess when Judgement comes you won't have any excuses for not believing... I've done my part... Think of it this way, by your standpoint we are all going to just stay in the earth and just become dead corpses, but my standpoint puts you to eternal damnation and me and the rest of the "Saved" into eternal bliss. Either way you lose, but I guess if you think of dirt rather then eternal fire and darkness it might just sound a little better.
*Sorry if this seems harsh. Had to say what I believe and I don't have an excuse or any regrets for it.
------------------
The Greatest single cause of Atheism in the world today is Christians who acknowledge Jesus with their lips but walk out the door and deny him by their lifestyle. That is what an unbelieving world simply finds unbelievable. -DC Talk
™ Version 4.2