Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evidence for and against Flood theories
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5850 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 23 of 112 (167992)
12-14-2004 5:51 AM
Reply to: Message 17 by TheLiteralist
12-13-2004 8:52 AM


Re: bum da bum da bum...
Hi holmes. If you're interested, we'll see what "evolves" in this thread...heh!
Not sure how much I want to get dragged into this, but your comments in the other thread make me curious for an answer.
You found freezing hurricanes (posited in a movie) a ridiculous concept, yet a worldwide flood (posited in book and movie) something real. I am wondering how you maintain these two positions consistently?
Indeed, without the Bible as a source that must be proven correct, there is really no obvious evidence that would have suggested there was a worldwide flood at all, that goes double for the idea that the earth is young and so all life was destroyed then and there creating all the fossils we see today.
What data convinced you of a flood before and outside of the Bible?

holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by TheLiteralist, posted 12-13-2004 8:52 AM TheLiteralist has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024