Reinstatement

You've had another year. I'll repeat I suggestion I think has been made before.You might "try out" your evolution killing ideas here before you go to the trouble of writing them up carefully. Given your past demonstration of knowledge and reasoning powers you might not want to waste time unless you've tested out the fundamentals of your idea.A couple of predictions:
You won't produce anything but junk: junk data and junk reasoning. That is IF you produce anything at all.
At least as likely: you won't produce jack squat.But you sure sound important with the potential noble prize winning idea of yours don't you?

My opinion is solely based on what you have posted before. It is based on your bragging about this paper a year ago. My opinion is that you are incapable of putting together coherent reasoning of any sort much less one that destroys evolution. lol What you detect in my words is derision and amusement with a tich of annoyance that you would be back to be a nuisance some more.You claim that you want to maintain surprise. Ha! If you actually have "earth shattering" evidence then you run the risk of being beat to publication if you stall.Those with real earth shattering evidence often rush out an early paper to make sure they get priority. You, on the other hand, are stalling because, just maybe, even you know you are dead meat if you dare to put any of it up to scrutiny.Thinking about it there was also a bit of curiosity in my mind but with a bit more thought I realize you will produce nothing new whatsoever so it isn't worth waiting for your "earth shattering" evidence.