Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Moderation Procedures to level the playing field
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 2 of 57 (422298)
09-16-2007 7:32 PM


Thread moved here from the Proposed New Topics forum.

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 31 of 57 (426813)
10-08-2007 8:49 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by Hyroglyphx
10-08-2007 8:28 PM


bad things said
NJ, as soon as any one says anything that they can't defend please point that out.
I do think that the examples of creationist deficiencies should be restricted to demonstrating what has to be done to level the playing field and not harped on too much.
You might want to start a separate thread to point out why these claims aren't true.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by Hyroglyphx, posted 10-08-2007 8:28 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by Hyroglyphx, posted 10-08-2007 9:02 PM AdminNosy has replied

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 39 of 57 (426825)
10-08-2007 9:39 PM
Reply to: Message 34 by Hyroglyphx
10-08-2007 9:02 PM


siding?
NJ, exactly what did I say that was coming down on one side?
Edited by AdminNosy, : change author

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by Hyroglyphx, posted 10-08-2007 9:02 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 46 of 57 (427021)
10-09-2007 1:59 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by Hyroglyphx
10-09-2007 1:51 PM


Supporting assertions
Are they really not supporting their assertions, or are you just unsatisfied by what they do present?
When support is presented and it is unsatisfactory that is most often explained. There are a large number of cases where there is no support offered whatsoever. In fact I'd say that "most" is wrong. Only a very few support their assertions with anything other than more assertions. And when they do they get the facts wrong but at least those few do offer some support.
I will continue to suspend IaJ when he makes assertions about speech but refuses to begin to support those assertions with his definition of what he is talking about. That is an example of the kind of "debate" that is not of any value to either party.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by Hyroglyphx, posted 10-09-2007 1:51 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024