teen4christ writes:
We are not obfuscating the word here. We are merely pointing out that things CAN be related through ways other than genetic inheritance.
Another common creationist tactic. You're ignoring the original point I made, that reproduction "according to its kind"
is about genetic inheritance.
If horses and donkeys can reproduce together, it's because they have similar enough DNA. They
are distant cousins, not just similar artworks. If you deny that, do you also deny the use of DNA for paternity tests?
If chimps and humans can also reproduce together, it's also because they have similar enough DNA. So why would they not be distant cousins instead of just similar artworks?
It seems to me that all you're doing is groping for an excuse to deny your (blood) relatives - and a pretty lame excuse at that.
“If you had half a brain, wouldn't you have realized after the second time, that it was you, not God?” -- riVeRraT
(see context here)
“The endearing controvertist! One needs to become acute in the ploys of his kind.” -- ThreeDogs