Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is the ‘missing link’ argument outdated?
Loudmouth
Inactive Member


Message 3 of 11 (117232)
06-21-2004 5:37 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by pink sasquatch
06-17-2004 11:19 AM


Good post. You should also realize that there is not a biological/geological "law" that requires the fossilization of every species that ever lived. In fact, given the lack of fossils for organisms that have become extinct in the last 200 years really pushes home this fact. Passenger pigeons are a perfect example. They numbered in the billions in North America until they went extinct about a hundred years ago. Guess what, no fossils of passenger pigeons.
You can also factor in the amount of land we have actually scoured for fossils. I wouldn't be surprised to hear a geologist claim that only 0.0001% of the earth has been searched for fossils. It's not so much that there are "missing" links. A more accurate portrayal is that they are "yet to be found" links.
And yet another factor is subduction. Old land is destroyed while new land is created. Right now there are fossils being pushed back into the mantle where they are melted into magma.
Just to sum up:
1. Fossilization is rare.
2. We haven't even scratched the surface in our search for new fossil species.
3. There are mechanisms that destroy fossils.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by pink sasquatch, posted 06-17-2004 11:19 AM pink sasquatch has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by pink sasquatch, posted 06-22-2004 6:49 PM Loudmouth has replied

  
Loudmouth
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 11 (117892)
06-23-2004 12:08 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by pink sasquatch
06-22-2004 6:49 PM


Re: no fossils of passenger pigeons...
quote:
I think a more scientific argument would be: both biological and geological evidence suggests that there will be gaps, and here's some evidence...
Exactly. On top of the fossil evidence is the corroboration between genetics and the fossil record. If the fossil record were a jumbled mess laid down by a global flood then we would not expect phylogenies based on the fossil record to match phylogenies based on DNA. The fact that we a correlation between DNA and the fossil record adds credence to both. Gaps or no gaps, there is no denying common ancestory.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by pink sasquatch, posted 06-22-2004 6:49 PM pink sasquatch has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024