Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Who won this evolution/ID debate?
greyseal
Member (Idle past 3890 days)
Posts: 464
Joined: 08-11-2009


Message 14 of 29 (547757)
02-22-2010 10:02 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by nwr
02-20-2010 12:21 PM


because one side writes technical papers, the other blasts from the pulpit...
seriously, that's the answer.
preachers preach. They don't have to be right, they just have to be loud and make the hearer feel the way the hearer thinks they should.
scientists strive to be right and to not lie, embellish or belittle.
preachers on the other hand feed off of and feed to emotion.
IDiots are often either preachers, or are preaching. They learn and know how to speak - plus it's a lot easier to say "I know this" when it's from ancient books written by goatherders purportedly saying what an omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent deity can or can't do, than when talking about apparent laws discovered by hand from within the system itself.
Scientists often don't know how to speak to the public either (see thunderf00t's meeting with the bananaman for making that cringingly clear).
When a scientist CAN speak - see PZ Myers, Richard Dawkins, Carl Sagan and many more - then they are beyond intimidating for IDiots because they show them up on their "home turf".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by nwr, posted 02-20-2010 12:21 PM nwr has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by nwr, posted 02-22-2010 10:33 AM greyseal has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024