1+1=2
1+1=10
are both correct eh?
They are both correct in that they are equivalent. There is no real mystery. If you REALLY want to show similar mathematical statements that blow away someones paradigm of reality then use
1+1=2 (in Z)
1+1=0 (in Z%2)
Rather than your caveat being that the number is simply transformed by a different base, you are instead using an entirely different group of numbers! =)
I love telling people that 1+1=0 in the smallest and simplest definition of a group of numbers that we know of.
Of course, biblical creationists are committed to belief in God's written Word, the Bible, which forbids bearing false witness; --AIG (lest they forget)
™ Version 4.2