Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evidence based smear campaigns
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2137 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


(1)
Message 4 of 49 (558916)
05-05-2010 2:03 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Apothecus
05-05-2010 1:42 PM


Stirring...
To stir the pot:
Try reasoning with the left wing fringe and they try to get you jailed (that hate speech nonsense).
If they don't riot and start breaking things (e.g., Santa Cruz, just a couple of days ago).
Dons flame suit.

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Apothecus, posted 05-05-2010 1:42 PM Apothecus has not replied

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2137 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 22 of 49 (558969)
05-05-2010 8:56 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by DC85
05-05-2010 8:36 PM


And there are at least three different kinds of "conservative," although there is a lot of overlap.
I see fiscal conservatives, small government conservatives, and "soc-cons" (social conservatives) who are generally religiously-motivated. These latter are often neither fiscal conservatives nor small government conservatives.
I suspect the study in the OP did not differentiate.

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by DC85, posted 05-05-2010 8:36 PM DC85 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024