Letters That Don't Make Any Sense

But then you'd be introducing a new letter to take the place of a consonant pair, where the individual parts already exist.
It's more efficient to have the two letters which can be either separate or connected, than to have 2 letters plus a third letter to represent their combination.Serbian and other Cyrillic languages pretty much all use phonetic alphabets, hence the use of things like e.g. 'ch' 'sh' 'shch' 'ts' -- CBF putting the proper Cyrillic in -- instead of just putting the corresponding letters together in a word.Those languages also lack the individual letter 'h' hence multiple letters where English just pairs up already-existing ones. Romance alphabets use letters more efficiently, hence needing fewer of them.

Similarly with 'graph', 'elephant' and any otehr word using that stupid ph.I find it especially amusing given that many of those words have a Greek root, where that consonant pair is represented by a single letter. And that letter already has an equivalent in nearly every language that only uses a single letter.Perhaps a better question would be "who the hell decided to use PH when translating instead of the normal bloody F like everyone else?!"