Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Intelligent design??There may be proof....
MrHambre
Member (Idle past 1422 days)
Posts: 1495
From: Framingham, MA, USA
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 11 of 17 (44840)
07-02-2003 10:46 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by compmage
06-26-2003 7:03 AM


quote:
Number_19 writes:
That's interesting,I always thought that evolution was a constant from even before life began.
compmage writes:
Evolution, as in 'things change', covers everything. The word is used many times, in many differenct theories, simply to indicate that things changed. The Theory of Evolution only deals with life, however, many people seem to think that whenever you mention evolution (change) if falls under the heading of the ToE and many then insist that the ToE must explain these things. This is not the case.
The concept of evolution via natural selection is certainly most important in terms of explaining the diversity of biotic forms, but don't sell it short. The differential reproductive success of forms is an algorithm that can be applied to contexts other than biological populations.
If you expose equal amounts of sulphur and iron to oxygen, a greater amount of iron oxide will be created than sulphur oxide, since iron oxidizes at a faster rate than sulphur. This is by no means evolution, but the atomic properties of certain elements can give them a form of selective advantage.
The exclusive optical left-handedness of amino acids used in living systems is strong evidence of an ancient selective struggle between right and left chirality in these organic compounds.
On various levels of scientific study, selection strategies have been invoked to explain phenomena that were previously assumed to be either stumbling blocks for Darwinism or evidence of intelligent design.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by compmage, posted 06-26-2003 7:03 AM compmage has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by compmage, posted 07-02-2003 2:54 PM MrHambre has not replied
 Message 13 by Peter, posted 07-03-2003 9:23 AM MrHambre has replied

  
MrHambre
Member (Idle past 1422 days)
Posts: 1495
From: Framingham, MA, USA
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 14 of 17 (44971)
07-03-2003 11:26 AM
Reply to: Message 13 by Peter
07-03-2003 9:23 AM


quote:
Presumably you mean that there is most likely a 'selection-base' explanation for the predominance of one chirality over the other.
That's correct. One variant form is favored by nature, so there must be some selective advantage.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Peter, posted 07-03-2003 9:23 AM Peter has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by Peter, posted 07-04-2003 4:52 AM MrHambre has not replied
 Message 16 by NosyNed, posted 07-04-2003 12:37 PM MrHambre has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024