Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Reality is not based upon our perception.
ringo
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 25 of 37 (346985)
09-06-2006 2:03 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by Phat
09-06-2006 5:18 AM


Re: Does reality require an observer?
Phat writes:
This is like saying that the refrigerator light may stay on when we shut the door!
I put my cat in there to find out. Now she knows but she won't tell me.
Either it does or it does not.
False dichotomy. How do you know that your light isn't entangled with mine?
Just because we are not observing something does not mean that the event is not happening.
Unless somebody observes it and communicates the observation to you, how can you know?
If God exists, then He is the observer that allows verification of creation.
So, how does God communicate His observations to us - in a reproducible way?

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by Phat, posted 09-06-2006 5:18 AM Phat has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by 1.61803, posted 09-06-2006 2:28 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 27 of 37 (347006)
09-06-2006 3:20 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by 1.61803
09-06-2006 2:28 PM


Re: Does reality require an observer?
1.61803 writes:
Perhaps the Universe is more like a mind (of God) than a thought or observation.
That works for me.
But communication between differents parts of the "mind" don't seem to be very effective.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by 1.61803, posted 09-06-2006 2:28 PM 1.61803 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by Phat, posted 09-11-2006 6:34 AM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 34 of 37 (348096)
09-11-2006 11:00 AM
Reply to: Message 31 by Phat
09-11-2006 6:34 AM


Re: Does reality require an observer?
Phat writes:
Ive never seen a star talk to another star.
If a star was "talking" to another star, how would you know?
Isn't that the point of this topic? How can we "know" anything outside our own perception?
It took a long time for us to realize that the bees' dance was a form of communication. It took a long time for us to realize that whales have sophisticated long-range communication networks.
The supposed lack of communication is based on our perception.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by Phat, posted 09-11-2006 6:34 AM Phat has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024