The state of ID/YECism here at EvC

Really while it maybe OT, i really would like to see you post anything on ID,creationism or evolution , that isn't twisting the meaning of what people really said, or making things up or smoke screening because you get called out by someone who knows more about it than you doanything I've read posted by creationists seems to be the same twisted nonsense i've seen dozens of timesplus please back up everything you just claimed please, if you want i can give you all 3 definitions, though i doubt you would bother to agree with any of themThis message has been edited by ReverendDG, 12-23-2005 03:36 AM

---

"Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it."
"Nuke 'em in the name of Jesus!"

1.Which nuggin told you Richards isn't even talking about its impact on the ToE, but on embryology2. because that whole thing was utter nonsense, and you are making a mountian out of a molehill3. which is utter nonsense and you still are twisting what people say4. which you have never been able to back up, jus made wild claimsby the by i've read enough to know that, most people claiming the negitive never bothered to read what science produces, just skimed parts they can use to convince people of thier viewsThis message has been edited by ReverendDG, 12-23-2005 02:23 PM