Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,898 Year: 4,155/9,624 Month: 1,026/974 Week: 353/286 Day: 9/65 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Where is the line between a disorder and else?
nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 4.5


(1)
Message 5 of 77 (704760)
08-16-2013 10:28 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by yenmor
08-16-2013 12:46 AM


At what point should we stop calling it natural and begin calling it a disorder?
Why cannot it be both?
I don't see a conflict between something being natural, yet a disorder.
To give a simple example, my hypertension is completely natural, yet I have no problem saying that it is a disorder. Nature has it's own natural way of handling hypertension, namely death. I take my prescribed medication, which is an unnatural way of handling it.
So, back to BIID. What would not seem natural for me can be quite natural for somebody with that disorder. Nature has its own way of coping. A person born blind finds his blindness quite natural, while a seeing person who lost sight later in life would find that very unnatural.
I would be inclined to say that BIID is abnormal, but not unnatural. We judge "normal" by what is common, and BIID falls outside of normal.
On the question of whether a disorder, it seems to me that the person with BIID does see it as a disorder, and the desire for amputation is an indication that the person would like to correct the disorder however he/she could.

Fundamentalism - the anti-American, anti-Christian branch of American Christianity

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by yenmor, posted 08-16-2013 12:46 AM yenmor has not replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 4.5


Message 28 of 77 (704875)
08-19-2013 4:51 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by yenmor
08-19-2013 3:05 PM


I don't want to be like black folks. After generations of struggle to gain their rights and place in mainstream society, they are now the most homophobic group of people. They continue to lag behind everyone else when it comes to percentage of acceptance of gay people. I don't want to be like that.
I'll say a word for the black folk.
Their homophobic attitudes come from their churches. Their churches are particularly important, because for many years they were their community. As racism reduces, we will likely see a corresponding reduction in the importance of the black churches, and a consequent reduction in homophobia. But we cannot expect that to happen all at once, especially since the racism didn't end all at once.

Fundamentalism - the anti-American, anti-Christian branch of American Christianity

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by yenmor, posted 08-19-2013 3:05 PM yenmor has not replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 4.5


(1)
Message 46 of 77 (704914)
08-20-2013 9:09 AM
Reply to: Message 41 by Rahvin
08-19-2013 9:07 PM


So tie this all back to the topic: If a man suffers from BIID and loathes his left arm and wishes it removed, is he crazy? Should amputation be considered a viable treatment, or should it not be an option at all? How do the concepts of "harm," life expectancy, self-harming choices, personal choice, self-determination, and quality of life align in such a case?
What comes to mind, for me, in this discussion is the question of the right to die; the right of a terminally ill person to die on his own terms and the right to assisted suicide in such cases.
Some of the arguments against allowing the BIID person to amputate have been presented in a way that would deny a terminally ill person the right to die.
Much like Rahvin, I don't have a settled position on BIID. But I am troubled by some of the arguments that have been given in this thread.

Fundamentalism - the anti-American, anti-Christian branch of American Christianity

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Rahvin, posted 08-19-2013 9:07 PM Rahvin has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by NoNukes, posted 08-20-2013 1:13 PM nwr has replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 4.5


Message 59 of 77 (704933)
08-20-2013 5:08 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by NoNukes
08-20-2013 1:13 PM


To which arguments are you referring.
I was thinking of comments such as that in Message 14. But perhaps I was reading more into that than intended.

Fundamentalism - the anti-American, anti-Christian branch of American Christianity

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by NoNukes, posted 08-20-2013 1:13 PM NoNukes has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024