Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,924 Year: 4,181/9,624 Month: 1,052/974 Week: 11/368 Day: 11/11 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Darwinists? and other names for "evos"
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 20 of 72 (163662)
11-28-2004 9:19 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by jeafl
11-28-2004 7:07 AM


quote:
To my understanding Punct Eek was proposed to explain the lack of transitional fossil forms.
Not true.
Punk Eek was proposed to explain the pace of evolution that was observed in the fossil record.
A form can stay relatively stable for a long time, and forms can change relatively rapidly.
Both of these claims about the pace of evolution were proposed because we have positive evidence to support them, not due to a lack of evidence for transitionals.
This message has been edited by schrafinator, 11-28-2004 09:20 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by jeafl, posted 11-28-2004 7:07 AM jeafl has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by jeafl, posted 11-28-2004 9:34 PM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 64 of 72 (163829)
11-29-2004 7:20 AM
Reply to: Message 30 by jeafl
11-28-2004 9:34 PM


I'd like to reply to this, because you have made some serious errors, but it is off topic.
Perhaps you can join one of the existing threads discussing punk eek, or propose a new punk eek topic?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by jeafl, posted 11-28-2004 9:34 PM jeafl has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024