Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Hey Cobra Snake (kyle)
TrueCreation
Inactive Member


Message 10 of 23 (9925)
05-18-2002 2:49 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by Percy
05-18-2002 9:59 AM


"Noah's flood is fine, but I'd like to narrow the topic. How about hydrodynamic sorting? I assume you'd want the con side, and if that's okay with you (if not please suggest another topic) then...
We need a Creationist to take the pro side. Tranquility Base? TrueCreation? Anyone else?"
--Well I think I gave a couple of my pennies with a comment on Hydrodynamics as it relates to depositional models over in the Flood Discussion thread:
Post #319 - http://www.evcforum.net/cgi-bin/dm.cgi?action=page&f=11&t=7&p=22
quote:
I, however, may tend to differ on TB's notion that this were due to hydrologic sorting, hydrologic sorting may have only taken much effect at all in small isolated places on the earth at short times, as well as possible slight mobility as sediment deposited and preceding the process of lithification. This will thus render hydrodynamics as it applies to fossil deposition highly minute.
--Tranquility seemed to agree with a responding post:
quote:
I agree with TCs qualifications of what I said. I think in some places I said hydrodynamic sorting/burial order and what TC said is what I meant by that. Survival order modulated by hydrodynamic sorting etc.
------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Percy, posted 05-18-2002 9:59 AM Percy has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024