most scientific papers are wrong?

Highly likely it is true but...so what? What is there here to discuss?Did you even read the paragraph following the two you quoted?Do you even have a clue what the scientific method entails?I'm sorry randman but you have never been able to show that you have the basic knowledge to even discuss something like this intellegently. I will allow you to try a revision of your OP to show an understanding of the basics but before this is considered for promotion you will have to demonstrate the ability to deal with scientific issues. This is something that would need to be discussed on the science side and at the current time you have not shown either a willingness to learn or the basic understanding of methodology needed.

---

No problem. I think it could be worthy of discussion in the science area but it simply highlights the need for replication and that has been a foundation of science for some time.Cold Fusion.