hey evos

Here is just the thread for you to define the terms you are using;
Message 1You can read up on how far the discussion got and finish it up for us. Then, when it is clear we understand the question, we can answer it for you.

However, when lawdog is registered I think it would be polite to supply some more of the content and point of the referenced article. It is asking a bit much of any of us to trot off the library for a specific point.

It wasn't meant to be a cheap shot at all. Sorry if it came across that way. I'm pretty surprised that you've reacted so strongly.I did say you should wait for registration and the appropriate topic to be started up. My real point is that pointing to books isn't going to move the debate along. They aren't easily accessible for most of us.Only if that is the only source do I think we should move off the web.

Thank you for that. I can only assure you that I wasn't. You are one of the names that I watch for as a post to be sure to read.Actually, what was in the back of my mind is setting an example for the likes of WT who has demonstrated an extraordinary lack of ability to suport his assertions. I think the the "light side" has to set a better than good example. I consider you strong in the force for good.