Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Size of the Universe
Annafan
Member (Idle past 4608 days)
Posts: 418
From: Belgium
Joined: 08-08-2005


Message 21 of 22 (493706)
01-10-2009 10:47 AM
Reply to: Message 20 by cavediver
01-10-2009 8:27 AM


Cavediver writes:
What we could see is multiple images of our own cluster of galaxies (and maybe the Milky Way istelf!) repeated in the night sky. This idea that the Universe could be wrapped around on itself is not that strange. In all of our higher dimensional theories, we consider the extra dimensions compactifed on some scale, such that they wrap up tightly. Thus, it is entirely reasonable to consider the possibility that our larg-scale dimensions are also compactified, just on a larger scale.
Very interesting.. I had heard of this before, but always considered it one of those "far out" ideas.
But there's something I'm confused with... And here it is.
So the idea would be:
- we see ourselves now, in this time
- we use a powerful telescope that can look back, say 5 billion (light)years, and maybe what we see is actually our OWN galaxy 5 billion years ago
- we use an EVEN more powerful telescope that can look back, say 10 billion (light)years, and maybe what we see is our own galaxy TEN billion years ago
Ok, sounds in some way thinkable.
But why would this be "discrete"? Where are the intermediate "past stages"?
Think about making a painting in paint software, with the "brush" tool, where you can configure the spacing between brushstrokes when you move the mouse. THe example with the telescopes of different power, would be like painting with a brush that leaves, say 100 pixels (5 billion years) between brush impressions on the canvas. But why wouldn't it be like a brush with NO intervals (resulting in a solid line on the canvas), all past stages still visible.
I hope you understand what I mean.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by cavediver, posted 01-10-2009 8:27 AM cavediver has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by cavediver, posted 01-10-2009 11:45 AM Annafan has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024