cavediver writes:
He's either an idiot, or for a deity, remarkably hard-up when it comes to paying for design plans.
Or, he's trying to make it look as though something like modern evolutionary theory is close to the explanation of the origin of the species we see around us.
I favour the "devious designers" explanation when we're examining the character of the Intelligent Designer(s), because it automatically fits all the evidence like a glove.
So, if I'm right, the real question would be: Why do the Intelligent Designers try and conceal themselves? (The plural is because polytheism would appear to be almost infinitely more likely than monotheism once we take away our cultural bias).
Apart from the suggestion of laissez-faire designers who merely design nature, something like Bluejay suggests above(only plural, to remove cultural prejudice
), there would appear to be nothing else that would fit the evidence, except, of course, the parsimonious "no designers" solution, the obvious default position unless or until we have
positive evidence for the existence of such beings.