Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,890 Year: 4,147/9,624 Month: 1,018/974 Week: 345/286 Day: 1/65 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Reply to the Skeptics on my book
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3956 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 8 of 16 (393263)
04-04-2007 4:03 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Dinoman15
04-03-2007 9:21 PM


one. get back on the old thread. it's not hard to find. stop mussing up our board.
two. don't list photos. show them to us.
three. living dinosaurs doesn't mean anything against evolution. congrats. there are loads of places we haven't explored on this planet. there's a whole island off the coast of india that no one has EVER been to, and i mean NEVER, EVER because of the stories about it from people who went near it way back in the way back when. some crazy shit about hell on earth and demons and evil and who knows. i wanna go. with a really big gun. did you know that there were stories of an ape man in china for EVER and then we finally figured it out in like the late 1800s? it was the giant panda. if you ever watch them move, they look like people from a distance. however. evolution doesn't really depend on things going extinct. it depends on things managing to stay alive. and clearly lots of things have done that. so when you understand evolution enough to make a real case about how this unseats evolutionary though, give me a call. in the mean time, go back to school and stop making unsupported claims.
four. courts don't actually trust eyewitness testimony. it's notoriously unreliable. people remember what they want to remember.
five. don't tell us about how well these photos and videos have been examined. until we can see them ourselves and examine them for ourselves, we won't buy it. and i've seen a lot of discovery channel pop-science and i've probably seen all of your photographs. i'm already not convinced. i know what smudgey silver nitrate can do. i use it on a regular basis. we don't tend to just believe shit people tell us. crazy, i know.
six. for god sake, answer people specifically one at a time. we're not impressed with your preaching. kent hovind spoke at my middle school. i told him he should take my science class and then try talking to people. i was 11 and knew he was full of crap. when you actually take the time to answer specific concerns with real evidence instead of lists and outrageous claims and half-truths and intimations, then maybe you'll get a little respect.
seven.
You say claim that there is no way that dinosaurs could evade detection and still be living today. Here are a few points you use:
-This Planet is completely explored; there is no room for new animals to be discovered; especially large creatures.
-If there undiscovered animals living then where are the carcasses, films, photographs, and dung to prove their existence?
i don't think anyone claimed those things on this board. you're creating your own arguments. address the questions we asked.
eight. mariners tend to be known drunks. especially those of days gone by. you'd be a drunk if you spent all that time looking at water you couldn't drink and nothing else. but. evolution-believing scientists have long accepted the idea that some sea animals may be difficult to find because they have learned that our mechanized boats tend to bring along big explosions. likewise, i'd imagine that our mechanized land vehicles have the same effect on land animals who have learned that big scary trucks bring stupid americans with big guns, cameras, and logging machinery.
nine. for god sake if you start a new thread every time you have something to say, i'm gonna e-stab you. i mean it. i'm not stable. you don't know. [these are the insane ravings brought on by the new batch of little kids who think they suddenly have all kinds of new ideas and can disprove all science EVAR and do not constitute any actual threat of harm.]
Edited by brennakimi, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Dinoman15, posted 04-03-2007 9:21 PM Dinoman15 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by Taz, posted 04-04-2007 1:05 PM macaroniandcheese has not replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3956 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 15 of 16 (393339)
04-04-2007 1:31 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by jar
04-04-2007 12:34 PM


Re: Stego on the rocks
other old pictures of boar
a real live boar
another real live boar
notice the emphasis on the bristles in the old pictures? notice how scary looking those assholes are?
further, that bottom creature looks like a lion which is clearly larger than this other animal. i'm probably wrong on that, and it's some god or another, but lions and boar still live in the same place (and lions used to live in asia), so this makes perfect sense. while there are no bones of stegosaurs from the time period in question. where are all the dead dinosaurs supposed to go?
Edited by brennakimi, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by jar, posted 04-04-2007 12:34 PM jar has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024