Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   On Infinity
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 8564
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 5.1


Message 21 of 56 (391172)
03-23-2007 6:41 PM


Adams Fun With Logic
In the late 80’s I participated in the early versions of these message forums. They were dial-up bulletin boards. At the time they were the coolest way to communicate across the country. Douglas Adams was a regular on one of them. He was into “techno stuff” as he liked to call it.
The “infinity” subject was as much debated there as has started here.
Just like Ulan Colluphid’s blockbuster trilogy, “Where God Went Wrong,” “Some More of God’s Greatest Mistakes” and “Who Is This God Person, Anyway?” the “infinity” issue was a tweak on peoples’ tails. Adams, who was an ardent atheist, liked to poke fun in his trademark subtle way. He was well aware of the logic error in the “infinity” joke but was set on tickling some of his Oxford collogues.
He used a lot of logical absurdities in his work.
“I refuse to prove that I exist,” says God, “for proof denies faith and without faith I am nothing.”
“Ahh, but the babelfish proves you exist,” says man, “therefore you don’t, QED!”
“Ohh! I hadn’t thought of that!” says God who promptly vanishes in a puff of logic.
“Ohh, that was easy,” says man who goes on to prove that black is white and gets killed at the next Zebra crossing.
Gotta love it.
Edited by AZPaul3, : No reason given.

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by Brad McFall, posted 03-23-2007 6:44 PM AZPaul3 has not replied
 Message 23 by tudwell, posted 03-23-2007 7:01 PM AZPaul3 has not replied

  
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 8564
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 5.1


Message 28 of 56 (391360)
03-24-2007 6:42 PM


Adams For President
Unfortunately Douglas Adams passed away in 2001.
His most revered books, The Hitch Hicker's Guide to the Galaxy series, Dirk Gently, the Meaning of Liff, were ALL jest. He was a comedian. Sort of a David Berry kinda guy.
None of his books were intended to be real. They were all SciFi comedy. Like Lewis Carroll, he used logic to the absurd.
abe: The Ulan Colluphid books I cited were all figments of Adam's imagination.
Edited by AZPaul3, : Well, I sort of thought I might explain something since it seemed to me that maybe, just maybe, some, not having taken the opportunity to enjoy said tomes, might not understand what it was to which, in my usual verbose and borderline cognitive way, I was referring, sorta.

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by AnswersInGenitals, posted 03-24-2007 8:47 PM AZPaul3 has not replied

  
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 8564
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 5.1


Message 31 of 56 (391498)
03-25-2007 12:11 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by AnswersInGenitals
03-24-2007 8:51 PM


Re: Adams Fun With Logic (&B McF's fun with illogic)
Brad McFall writes:
Cantor was suggesting relations to Opticks actually and Soma is a long way from that. But no one has taken the possiblity beyond his barely cognizable artistic judgment that a painting (think- Writing on Infinity) and a symphony (think harmony of nature's laws) may NOT have the same infinity abstracted from them. Of course Frege was confident that no one would grab some sand and determine a transfinite thought with it but then again no one has gone beyond Russell's shoehotel of logic into one that with Kant could exist and which biologists may find perceptive for its current difference of geneotype and phenotype.
You do realize don't you that you are quite incorrect about this?
Now, Answers, how could you possible know this? Last time I looked the "McFall-to-English" decryption program had degenerated into absolute gibberish and was sent back into R&D. Has there been some kind of major advance in decryption algorithms of which I am unaware?
Edited by AZPaul3, : Well, see, when one is in a hurry one has a tendency to leave out words that should be in the sentence. Sometimes ones fingers are incapable of keeping up with ones thought processes and thus compensates by skipping certain words, like, the subject of the sentence. This is not conducive to proper communication and, thus, a correction was in order.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by AnswersInGenitals, posted 03-24-2007 8:51 PM AnswersInGenitals has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by AnswersInGenitals, posted 03-25-2007 6:16 PM AZPaul3 has not replied
 Message 33 by AnswersInGenitals, posted 03-25-2007 6:22 PM AZPaul3 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024