Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,928 Year: 4,185/9,624 Month: 1,056/974 Week: 15/368 Day: 15/11 Hour: 3/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Randomness - What is it?
nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 12 of 13 (288076)
02-18-2006 11:59 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by SuperNintendo Chalmers
02-17-2006 7:22 PM


"Random" is a mathematical term
It is best to think of "random" as a technical term in mathematics (from probability theory). We apply that mathematics to real world phenomena where we find that appropriate. We find it natural, in such circumstances, to apply the word "random" to what is modelled.
There is also some colloquial use of the word "random". One common instance of this is in the local port used for a network connection. If you look at the output of "netstat -n" on your computer, you might see something like this:

1.2.3.4:1179 207.36.231.74:80 ESTABLISHED

where the "1.2.3.4" is your local IP address, and "207.36.231.74" happens to be the IP address of evcforum. The "80" is the port you are connecting to. The "1179" is the local port you are using for this connection. The local port is often called a "random port". On a window box, the first connection ever made will use 1024 for a random port, 1025 for the next random port, 1026 for the next, etc. That is, these are usually assigned sequentially. Sequential is pretty neat for something called "random.". The term "random" is used here to mean that there is no significance to the particular choice. It could be anything. It happens to be done sequentially, because thats the easiest thing for software to do.
For the term "random" as used in "random mutation", you should simply take that as saying that there is no rhyme or reason for this particular mutation rather than a different one. Or, at least, there is no known reason or mechanism that preferred this mutation over a different one, and all the evidence suggests that there could not be a mechanism behind the choice.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by SuperNintendo Chalmers, posted 02-17-2006 7:22 PM SuperNintendo Chalmers has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by randman, posted 02-18-2006 5:56 PM nwr has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024