Are you claiming the field of physics has no bearing at all on the field of biology?
For all practical purposes it does not.
You'd think there would be an even more direct connection between physics at the quantum mechanical level and something like structural engineering. However, you may astonish me by showing that engineers use quantum mechanics to determine the appropriate load bearing material when building a bridge. In fact that level of physics is ignored.
When solving problems or thinking about a specific area it is important to set the levels of abstraction correctly. Population genetics does not worry about the precise chemistry of DNA much less the physics of the interaction of molecules.
Your suggesting a meaningful tie is an example of erroneous thinking of a very fundamental nature.
If you wish to suggest, on the other hand, that the laws of the universe were designed by some self-aware force to produce the possibility of life like ourselves evolving then you are free to do so. You may even choose to make this a foundation stone of your faith. There is no way to support or falsify such an idea at present. We don't know why the laws of the universe are as they are.
This view is a philosophical one which isn't something having anything at all to do with biology and the evolutionary ideas contained there.
Of course, if you choose to build your faith on such foundational assumptions then you are at risk of having the foundation shattered at some future date. That puts you in the same position as those who have faith resting on the sand of a literal genesis.
™ Version 4.2
