Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Zephan: What is Evidence?
Percy
Member
Posts: 22505
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.4


Message 6 of 90 (32460)
02-17-2003 2:51 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by Zephan
02-17-2003 1:29 PM


Hi Zephan,
The legal and scientific definitions of evidence are unlikely to be the same. From your past posts I gather that you would like to apply a legal definition of evidence in a scientific context, which would be inappropriate, sort of like using NFL rules in a soccer game.
I couldn't myself produce the legal definition of evidence, but my guess is that its waters are muddied somewhat by a legal process where judges decide what is evidence and what isn't.
In science, evidence is that which is apparent in some way to the five senses. Replicability is important in science, so evidence must either be available to or reproducible by any competent practitioner in the relevant field of scientific endeavor.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Zephan, posted 02-17-2003 1:29 PM Zephan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by Zephan, posted 02-19-2003 7:26 AM Percy has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22505
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.4


Message 9 of 90 (32489)
02-17-2003 5:36 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by Zephan
02-17-2003 4:40 PM


Hi Zephan,
In this thread Mark hasn't said any of the things you've attributed to him, he's only asked you for your definition of evidence. I've given you science's definition of evidence, and now I, too, would like to see yours.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Zephan, posted 02-17-2003 4:40 PM Zephan has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by mark24, posted 02-17-2003 7:38 PM Percy has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22505
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.4


Message 19 of 90 (32700)
02-19-2003 8:28 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by Zephan
02-19-2003 7:26 AM


Hi Zephan,
Imaginary conversation:
Me: I'm having this on-line discussion with someone about the definition of scientific evidence.
Friend: Oh. What did you tell him.
Me: I told him that evidence is information available to us through the five senses.
Friend: Uh-huh. What does he think it is?
Me: I don't know, he won't say.
Friend: Then why are you wasting your time?
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Zephan, posted 02-19-2003 7:26 AM Zephan has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22505
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.4


Message 24 of 90 (33359)
02-27-2003 9:15 AM
Reply to: Message 23 by bambooguy
02-26-2003 10:56 PM


Re: More on pens and swans
BambooGuy writes:
P.S. Does anyone know the HTML symbol for 'tab'. I can't remember.
The reason you can't remember it is because you never knew it because it doesn't exist. But you can use the [INDENT] UBB code, like this (case isn't significant in UBB codes, but I've used upper case here):
[INDENT]This is an indented region.[/INDENT]
Which would end up looking like this:
This is an indented region.
In case you're interested in looking under the hood, the software translates it into this HMTL:
This is an indented region.
The "in" class definition is in a cascading style sheet and looks like this:
/* indentation for [indent] UBB code */
.in {
margin-left: 15pt;
margin-right: 15pt;
}
Naturally you can use the
HTML tag yourself, which gives you an indent about twice as great. You can also use "style=" inside the blockquote tag and specify styles yourself, eg:
If you wanted a tab function in order to line up text into orderly columns then you have to use the HTML tag, but use "class=ms1" or "class=ms2" for the tags or you won't like the results.
--Percy
[This message has been edited by Percipient, 02-27-2003]
This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by bambooguy, posted 02-26-2003 10:56 PM bambooguy has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22505
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.4


Message 37 of 90 (35803)
03-30-2003 9:37 AM
Reply to: Message 36 by Zephan
03-30-2003 8:47 AM


Zephan writes:
After that, we'll discuss the little things like whether what is perceivable to the five senses is even relevant to the proposition you wish to establish.
Maybe an example will help. I check the outside temperature, the date and the time, and I write them down in my weather journal. This, to me, is data, and I can use it as evidence in support of any relevant assertions I might make, such as, "March has been a colder month so far this year than last."
This is pretty much the way experimental science is taught - measure it, write it down, analyze it, use it as evidence to support your hypothesis.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by Zephan, posted 03-30-2003 8:47 AM Zephan has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22505
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.4


Message 61 of 90 (36021)
04-01-2003 1:46 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by Mister Pamboli
04-01-2003 11:34 AM


Zephan writes:
See how we have slipped from Bias as evidence to "evidence of Bias" in a discussion of what constitutes evidence. I can only speak for myself, but to me this does not read like Zephan is experienced in reasoned arguement, the nature of evidence or predicate logic. What do others think?
Zephan appears to be following a well established lawyerly tactic: when the evidence is against you, obfuscate. He began by ignoring questions, and moved on to introducing irrelevancies. He clearly knows that where juries are concerned, confusion trumps rational arugments.
There are a myriad of other available obfuscative techniques that Zephan can employ, and this discussion can not and will not progress as long as engaging the discussion would be counter to his interests. For the time being, clarity does not serve Zephan's goals.
In a court of law the judge is the guardian at the gate deciding which evidence and arguments are admitted and which are not. In debates here, board administration usually avoids trying to play this role, but at present much space is being devoted across many threads to unsupported and/or nonsensical arguments that don't seem worth responding to.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Mister Pamboli, posted 04-01-2003 11:34 AM Mister Pamboli has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024