quote:
Well I would assume that it is written for creationists who beleive that their views can be scientifically supported and who care about scientific credibility.
Now that is a small audience!
But you are probably right...I have heard rumors that some creationists sites no longer post Kent Dr.Dino Hovind's crap because it is so fallacious that even they do not want to be associated.
I still think TC's essay would reach a broader group by including Intelligent Design as that group has not presented a testable and falsifiable hypothesis. But creationists for the most part are completely lacking in background and understanding of scientific methodology so hopefully TC can reach a few...not to necessarily change their minds but at least get some of them away from the "evilusion aint true cuz my cat did not give birth to a cow" type of arguing.