Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Negative Impacts on Society
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5901 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 48 of 222 (95260)
03-27-2004 10:20 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by Servant2thecause
03-27-2004 5:54 PM


Re: Bad scientist or bad science?
You might find this document interesting in this context: the Pacific College curriculum on the evolution vs creationism question (from a Christian Ministries private college). 60 pages of mostly "quotes from evolutionists" - nearly every single one of which is either distorted, taken out of context, misapplied (i.e., from discussions PE vs gradualism, cladistics over traditional phylogeny, etc), or horribly outdated. An amazing compilation of the worst of the worst, apparently culled from creationist sites all over the web and especially from the first edition of the famous Quote Book (now the Revised Quote Book). Fascinating reading.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by Servant2thecause, posted 03-27-2004 5:54 PM Servant2thecause has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by Servant2thecause, posted 03-27-2004 11:11 PM Quetzal has replied

  
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5901 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 52 of 222 (95338)
03-28-2004 8:34 AM
Reply to: Message 49 by Servant2thecause
03-27-2004 11:11 PM


Re: Bad scientist or bad science?
I totally agree with you inre bad quotes (although I think others have argued the Gen 1 & 2 case pretty exhaustively - another topic I'm sure). One of the reasons I have very little respect for many of the evilution-slayers that wander through this forum is that often their arguments devolve to little more than lists of erroneous or misleading quotes. Then they demand that their opponents either refute every single quote or admit defeat. OTOH, I greatly appreciate someone who is willing to challenge neodarwinism or even the ToE on its merits by addressing what the theory actually says, rather than what someone might have said about it.
I did expend some effort once to do precisely what I despise - waste a great deal of effort and space discussing one such list right here on this forum. You might find Creationists and Quotemines a worthwhile read.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by Servant2thecause, posted 03-27-2004 11:11 PM Servant2thecause has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024