RAZD on the "it's all intepretation and presupposition" fallacy
RAZD in the thread "So Just How is ID's Supernatural-based Science Supposed to Work?": message #50
RAZD seems to have the same basic I answer I give to the claim that the evidence for evolution is just a matter of how one interprets the evidence, but I like the way he expressed it here. I may borrow this one myself.