Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A little rant for desdamona
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 30 of 85 (102044)
04-22-2004 11:24 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by AdminAsgara
04-22-2004 4:26 PM


Re: A humble suggestion for the Queen
quote:
3. Des needs to learn to write in a manner that does not leave her opponents shuddering when they think that she is home-school teacher.
Oh my.
A HOME SCHOOL TEACHER???!!!
Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by AdminAsgara, posted 04-22-2004 4:26 PM AdminAsgara has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by coffee_addict, posted 04-23-2004 1:36 AM nator has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 31 of 85 (102045)
04-22-2004 11:28 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by Trixie
04-22-2004 5:47 PM


Re: I have to agree with Sylas
quote:
I would suggest to Des that she drop the "Bible thumping" and stop hammering all of us over the head with her opinions and spend the time in finding out just exactly what evolutionists believe in the first place before condemning us all to Hell for believing something we don't!
About a week ago, I already suggested that she do exactly that.
At first she accused me of "preaching" evolution, but then I explained that I wasn't asking her to believe it, just understand it.
She then said something like, "Thanks for the clarification!"
...and then went on her merry way, unchanged and unrepentant.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Trixie, posted 04-22-2004 5:47 PM Trixie has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by One_Charred_Wing, posted 04-23-2004 12:25 AM nator has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 33 of 85 (102054)
04-22-2004 11:59 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by Cold Foreign Object
04-22-2004 10:37 PM


quote:
The branch of science called scientism sure exists to reject God and overturn Genesis.
Um, scientism is a type of philosophy, not a branch of science, WT.
While it would not be unusual for a scientist to hold to this philosophy, it certainly is not a requirement, as the 40% of scientists who believe in God are evidence of.
Science is conducted via methodological naturalism; what individual scientists believe personally about the supernatural doesn't enter into their work.
quote:
Doesn't matter what you claim - opinions/hatreds about the God of Genesis does not cease at the laboratory door.
This comment reminds me of a story.
There was a fellow named Eric who worked in my department for about 4 months, until he was fired for poor performance.
I ran into him several months after that, and he was clearly kind of embarassed. He kept going on and on about how he just knew everyone he had worked with probably talked about how terrible a job he did, and what a loser he was.
I, of course, told him that this wansn't at all the case, which was absolutely true.
The truth was, we didn't think about him at all.
We forgot about him almost immediately.
My point in telling this story is to remind you that all of us tend to be self-absorbed and think that we are the cause of other people's behavior, when it is most often not the case at all.
WT, you seem to think that most scientists are sitting around their labs, hating God. The fact is, most scientists are way too busy writing grants, teaching lectures, preparing work for conferences, attending department faculty meetings, and supervising the grad students doing their research to have much time left over to plot ways to dethrone your Sovereign Lord.
Scientists may hate God, but they probably do it on the weekends.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 04-22-2004 10:37 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024