Honorable Opponents

He is VERY respectable and kindly corresponded to my questions to him about creation and biology. If one looks at instead Johnson's entry into creationism it is clear that if one first answered Syamsyu(or still how I misspell the name)about WHEN reproduction occurs (it depends on how one takes the word "dimension") then Johnson can be read to have made MORE out of the failure of evolutionists to clearly seperate fact finding and theoretical SPACE which I have NEVER found Morris to pervert or revert to than is available about the information involved which founds but those thoughts only that seek to see GOD idolically than the difference in flesh the words will both spell. Johnson made "writing" creationism EASIER as one did not need to refer at least in thought as much to Scripture as Morris remands but it does demand that evolutionary man is easier to support by defense rather than that defense being offensive which it really is especially if one's view of biology and creation continues to follow such as my correspondence with the elder Morris who quite simply stated that if any advance is made in evoulution by manipulation and mathematical calcuation the same is gain saidly possible to the creationist. I suspect that Gould has abrogated this and if so some one such as Mark25 will be able to see that light no longer turned off by said "scientists".