Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,920 Year: 4,177/9,624 Month: 1,048/974 Week: 7/368 Day: 7/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Four More Years...
Phat
Member
Posts: 18353
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 43 of 105 (88487)
02-24-2004 11:00 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by Percy
02-24-2004 9:40 PM


When I was growing up, I knew only one thing about Republicans and Democrats. One group was represented by a fat elephant and the other group was a braying donkey. Later, I noticed that the democrats were mostly younger people who had no money except for the Kennedys. The Republicans, by contrast, were always owners of businesses and people that looked like the man in Monopoly.
Now, I see it like this: Republicans have a power base concentrated in material wealth,business,and money. Democrats have a power base concentrated in political ideology,education, and money. If the Republican power base were torpedoed by a stray WMD, the wealth would transfer into more hands. This would make the Democrats a solid favorite for leadership. The more that people suffer, the stronger the Democratic statesman becomes. Perhaps I am a bit oversimplistic, but Republican ideology is the Religious right, whereas Democratic ideology is secular humanism.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by Percy, posted 02-24-2004 9:40 PM Percy has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by nator, posted 02-25-2004 9:11 AM Phat has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18353
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 51 of 105 (88564)
02-25-2004 9:49 AM
Reply to: Message 46 by Dr Jack
02-25-2004 4:54 AM


Re: Military
America spends a disproportionatly vast quantity on 'defense'. It doesn't need to. If it brought it's defense spending more in line with the rest of the world, the world would be better off, and America would be better off.
The technology that gives America an edge over the poor disenfranchised masses costs a lot of money. Morally, I am opposed to military buildup. Realistically, the masses will eventually even the playing field and compromise our capitalist lifestyle if we do not keep them in check. as a Christian, I say let it happen. For an American who wants their kids to have it all as well, however, the price insures the Empire.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by Dr Jack, posted 02-25-2004 4:54 AM Dr Jack has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by Mammuthus, posted 02-25-2004 10:04 AM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18353
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 54 of 105 (88575)
02-25-2004 10:16 AM
Reply to: Message 53 by Mammuthus
02-25-2004 10:04 AM


Re: Military
You did not read my post. I said that as a Christian I was opposed to military buildup. I said that an American with kids who wanted to preserve their lifestyle may support it. I am not that American. I have no kids. You also brought up the countries with low military spending. They only have low spending because they sit under the American umbrella of protection.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by Mammuthus, posted 02-25-2004 10:04 AM Mammuthus has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by Mammuthus, posted 02-25-2004 10:52 AM Phat has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024