Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is Anything Evil? Does Evil Exist?
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 11 of 135 (398719)
05-02-2007 10:52 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by Rob
05-02-2007 10:24 AM


Worldviews and Creation/Evolution
Rob writes:
Perhpas you can begin to perceive how interrelated these recent posts of mine are. I hope someone catches the Spirit of it, for it's purposes are honest and pure.
Rob,in my thread writes:
And that has been my most difficult struggle; to realize that I cannot persuade anyone. That the truth is nonsense to them. It absolutely kills me, and seems so unfair...
But are you sure that the truth is nonsense to Percy? I do not see him as an unwitting tool of Satan...after all, were it not for him, you and I would not be able to have a soapbox for Gods cause!
Belief in evolution tends to produce worldviews that say that humans are a product of their environment (nature)
Belief in a Creator tends to produce worldviews that say that humans are a product of their decisions (nurture)
Does that make any sense? If humans were evil by nature, evil would be natural and God would be a human construct or a reality that everyone will face one way or another.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Rob, posted 05-02-2007 10:24 AM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by Rob, posted 05-03-2007 12:47 AM Phat has not replied

Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 60 of 135 (398949)
05-03-2007 5:03 AM
Reply to: Message 53 by Rob
05-03-2007 2:17 AM


Re: Still falling short
Gregory Koukl is a Christian Apologist who has a unique perspective on Evil that you may find interesting, Rob. It is relevant to this topic because it comes from the worldview of a creationist.
The full article can be found here.
In a nutshell, what the crux of his argument is is this:
STR writes:
The first step in answering the problem of evil is this: We've got to get clear on what this thing "evil" actually is. It does seem to follow that if God created all things, and evil is a thing, then God created evil. This is a valid syllogism. If the premises are true, then the conclusion would be true as well.
The problem with that line of reasoning is that the second premise is not true. Evil is not a thing. The person who probably explained it best was St. Augustine, and then Thomas Aquinas picked up on his solution. Others since them have argued that evil has no ontological status in itself.
Let me give you an illustration to make this more clear. We talk about things being cold or warm. But coldness is not a thing that exists in itself; it has no ontological status. Coldness is the absence of heat. When we remove heat energy from a system, we say it gets colder.
"Cold" isn't a thing. It's a way of describing the reduction of molecular activity resulting in the sensation of heat. So the more heat we pull out of a system, the colder it gets. Cold itself isn't being "created." Cold is a description of a circumstance in which heat is missing. Heat is energy which can be measured. When you remove heat, the temperature goes down. We call that condition "cold," but there is no cold "stuff" that causes that condition.
Same thing with a shadow. Shadows don't exist as things in themselves; they're just the absence of light.
Evil is like that. Evil isn't like some black, gooey stuff floating around the universe that gloms onto people and causes them to do awful things. Evil is the absence of good, a privation of good, not a thing in itself.
So donut holes don't exist; they're just the absence of donut. Shadows don't exist; they're just the absence of light. And evil doesn't exist; it's just the absence of good.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by Rob, posted 05-03-2007 2:17 AM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 63 by Rob, posted 05-03-2007 9:15 AM Phat has not replied

Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 106 of 135 (399142)
05-04-2007 8:29 AM
Reply to: Message 102 by Archer Opteryx
05-04-2007 1:20 AM


Re: Reality= all opposites
Archer writes:
Reality is reality. It includes good and evil. It also includes light and dark, life and death, yin and yang, Elvis and Elvis impersonators.
Insisting that 'darkness is only the absence of light, impersonators are only the absence of Elvis' doesn't change any of this. Reality would still include both the 'presence' and 'absence' states of whatever it is you're talking about.
IF I were to go with the idea that truth is an absolute and that Jesus Christ is truth, (in a living sense) I would be approaching this argument by declaring that God is good, evil is the absence of God (in the sense that whenever a person sins, they are denying God either consciously or subconsciously at that moment.)
Anyway....addressing your point:
Archer writes:
Reality is reality. It includes good and evil. It also includes light and dark, life and death, yin and yang, Elvis and Elvis impersonators.
purpledawn writes:
Good is not a thing either. So good doesn't exist; it is just the absence of evil.
In literature and speech people personify objects, abstract concepts, and human emotions, opinions, and personalities to name just a few.
Evil is an descriptive word that has been personified.
What is deemed evil or good, as has been mentioned already, is relative to the person or group using the word.
At the risk of being labeled a blatant quote miner, I will attempt to address some points in this thread from a scriptural basis.
I am also going to put on my charismatic worldview hat for a moment so as to support Robs attempt at formulating a position concerning this subject. Bear with my ignorance, therefore, if you detect it in its many guises.
  • First, we have this idea that both good and evil are relative and not in and of themselves personified. A fundamentalist may assert that Jesus Christ, as Gods Son and personified member of the Trinity, is good incarnate. Jesus Himself pointed to His Father as good.(Matthew 19:17) A Biblical Literalist may also declare that the Devil is real and is also personified evil, having no Holy Spirit with him just as Jesus had none of Satan in Him. (John 8:44) One example that may be used to prove this point is Jesus saying (to His Disciples)
    NIV writes:
    Matt 24:9-10-- "Then you will be handed over to be persecuted and put to death, and you will be hated by all nations because of me.
    It would give us pause to wonder why on earth men would be hated. If evil is not personified, does it then follow that hate is not synonymous with evil? (I suppose that the critics would say that one mans evil is another mans good.) IMO, whether it was Americans "rejoicing" over Hiroshima or Muslims "rejoicing" over 9-11 it was still a bit of a relative reaction to ones culture triumphing over another culture.
    So we could agree that human response to good and/or evil is relative to our own mind.
    We have yet to determine whether good and evil are themselves absolutes, however.
    In response to the Rich Young Ruler, Jesus said:
    NIV writes:
    Matt 19:17-- "Why do you ask me about what is good?" Jesus replied. "There is only One who is good. If you want to enter life, obey the commandments."
    Does this mean that good is an absolute? My critics may assert that even though the Bible has an absolute view of good and evil, the Bible itself is a fallible creation of human wisdom. The philosophical implications still stand, however, if we are to argue whether a human author can be inspired by an absolute belief.
    We could say that all beliefs are relative to the individuals who profess them, but the question would be whether there is such a thing as absolute concepts. One mans God is another mans myth. One mans devil is another mans lifestyle.
    purpledawn writes:
    In literature and speech people personify objects, abstract concepts, and human emotions, opinions, and personalities to name just a few.
    True. And it could be argued that a fundamentalist, by accepting Christ into their heart, consciously or subconsciously personifies God as they understand Him. This is why down through History, the absolutists never considered the possibility that they were human since they had personified a Divine Creator into their internal Ego.
    Lets look at one of my own examples which spoke to me from the book of revelation:
    NIV writes:
    Rev 1:8-- "I am the Alpha and the Omega," says the Lord God, "who is, and who was, and who is to come, the Almighty."
    Compare and contrast with:
    NIV writes:
    Rev 17:7-8-- The beast, which you saw, once was, now is not, and will come up out of the Abyss and go to his destruction. The inhabitants of the earth whose names have not been written in the book of life from the creation of the world will be astonished when they see the beast, because he once was, now is not, and yet will come.
    From a literalist worldview, God is seen to have always existed. The devil is seen to have been a created thing who freely chose to sin (or chose to be separated from the absolute reality of God (as absolute) thus becoming Fallen and personifying evil. Remember that according to dogma and some Christian tradition, God never created evil. He created the possibility of evil. In that sense, evil is not personified in humans unless we choose it.
    The argument then shifts to whether our choices have to be governed as absolutes.
    In the above scriptures from Revelation, there is no gray area between the two terms, is and is not.
    Edited by Phat, : fixed quote
    Edited by Phat, : fixed mis attributed quote

  • This message is a reply to:
     Message 102 by Archer Opteryx, posted 05-04-2007 1:20 AM Archer Opteryx has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 108 by Archer Opteryx, posted 05-04-2007 12:03 PM Phat has not replied
     Message 109 by purpledawn, posted 05-04-2007 4:34 PM Phat has not replied
     Message 110 by Archer Opteryx, posted 05-04-2007 7:53 PM Phat has not replied
     Message 112 by purpledawn, posted 05-04-2007 10:52 PM Phat has not replied

    Newer Topic | Older Topic
    Jump to:


    Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

    ™ Version 4.2
    Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024