Ark of the Covenant

quote:

---

I'm making a declaration that the Bible has stood up to scrutiny. If you want to challenge that as it relates to the Ark, by all means discuss it here, as its the appropriate thread. If you want to contest the bible in any other capacity, then open a new thread.

---

According to the rules of this forum you are meant to support your assertions. Since you seem insistent on only discussing the Ark of the Covenant in this thread then I must ask which of the Bibles claims about the Ark have actually been verified by independant evidence ?

But compare with Buz saw in his new prophecy thread. It's pretty obvious that Buz has got no idea of what Daniel or Nahum are about, even though he's quoting them. I can put a whole list of other mistakes he's made in the past, too. And he boasts abut how he's studied the Bible for decades ! Never mind all the misinformation going around fundamentalists circles like the idea that Luke's genealogy of Jesus is really Mary's - an idea with no foundation in the text of Luke whatsoever.

"Fulfilled Prophecy" thread in The Bible: Accuracy and Inerrancy.