Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,910 Year: 4,167/9,624 Month: 1,038/974 Week: 365/286 Day: 8/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Constant Claim: Scientist/academic=Atheist
CK
Member (Idle past 4157 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 1 of 24 (143385)
09-20-2004 4:47 PM


One of the constant claims that appears time and time again is that Scientist/academics cannot be trusted in regards to judging "religious" matter as they will suppress any evidence that does not fit a materialist world view.
The reason given for this (claimed) behaviour is that it is due to a lack of belief or being an atheist. A recent example of this can be found in the is man inherently good or inherently evil? thread.
quote:
They deliberately suppress any connection of spiritual truths and attempt to construct theories devoid of any such reference. This is not any less biased, however, for many of these people merely want to get noticed in their own little circle of (mostly atheist) scholars.
  —phatboy
I want this thread to have a very narrow focus - I want people who support this view to provide evidence that:
a) Those involved in physical sciences are mostly atheist (therefore AT LEAST 51%)
and/or
b) Those involved in the social sciences/humanities are mostly atheist (therefore AT LEAST 51%)
That is the start and end of the debate - we are NOT here to discuss other matters.
This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 09-20-2004 03:49 PM
This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 09-20-2004 03:50 PM

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by CK, posted 09-21-2004 4:49 PM CK has replied
 Message 9 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 09-25-2004 2:38 PM CK has not replied

  
CK
Member (Idle past 4157 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 3 of 24 (143711)
09-21-2004 4:49 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by CK
09-20-2004 4:47 PM


First one to the plate is...
plenty of the creationists make this claim - I'm sure they be only too happy to provide the evidence now they have a chance!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by CK, posted 09-20-2004 4:47 PM CK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by CK, posted 09-22-2004 1:18 PM CK has not replied

  
CK
Member (Idle past 4157 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 4 of 24 (143899)
09-22-2004 1:18 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by CK
09-21-2004 4:49 PM


oh dear seems
that not one of creationists wants to step up.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by CK, posted 09-21-2004 4:49 PM CK has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Brad McFall, posted 09-22-2004 5:47 PM CK has replied

  
CK
Member (Idle past 4157 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 6 of 24 (143946)
09-22-2004 7:11 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by Brad McFall
09-22-2004 5:47 PM


Re: oh dear seems
english translation anyone?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Brad McFall, posted 09-22-2004 5:47 PM Brad McFall has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by Ooook!, posted 09-22-2004 7:24 PM CK has not replied

  
CK
Member (Idle past 4157 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 13 of 24 (144686)
09-25-2004 4:24 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by Coragyps
09-25-2004 4:10 PM


Willowtree has as you say got this entirely back to front and clearly had not read the first post properly.
The ONLY focus of this thread is some stats that prove that academics and scientists are mostly atheist (51% or more).
The actual issue of bias is NOT the matter under discussion.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Coragyps, posted 09-25-2004 4:10 PM Coragyps has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024