Phillip, it seems that you cut'n'pasted a list of "gaps" in scientific theories in June 02. However it appears that you never actually settled on any to discuss further, you simply repeated second-hand bald assertions. Your supposed gaps of scientific credulity are most likely gaps in the scientific understanding of creationists and idists, not the real gaps which you assert.
Feel free to open threads on specific "gaps". It would be more rewarding than arguing theological interpretations and metaphors.
In summary, the "gaps" in the theory of evolution are largely illusory as any analysis of your list would demonstrate. The gaps which remain open for some theists to squeeze their idea of god into are progressively tightening.
™ Version 4.2