Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Eye Evolution: Zhimbo vs Joralex
Admin
Director
Posts: 13042
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 1 of 11 (65298)
11-09-2003 9:00 AM



Notice
Only Zhimbo, Joralex and moderators are permitted to post to this thread. Posts from anyone else will be deleted without saving or explanation. Moderators should immediately delete extraneous posts when encountered. Zhimbo and Joralex should ignore any extraneous posts they find that haven't yet been deleted.

This debate has its roots in the Evolution of the eye? The myth goes on... thread where discussion on this topic began, and in the Existence of God thread where agreement to formal debate was reached.

Moderators for the Debate

I have had no Creationist volunteers, and so I am the sole moderator. If any qualified Creationist volunteers to help moderate after the debate begins I will add him at that point. Moderator list:
Percy (Member ID: Percipient)

Comments about the Debate

A parallel thread has been started in the Evolution forum titled Eye Evolution: Comments about the Great Debate. All comments, suggestions, feedback, etc, about the debate by non-participants should be made to that thread.

Format of the Debate

The debaters will alternate posts, but moderators will respond with comments and scoring after each post by a debater. This means that debaters should wait until the moderators have responded before posting their response. The moderator posts should prove very helpful to debaters by indicating where effort should be placed.
By agreement reached in the Existence of God thread, Zhimbo will go first after November 17, 2003.

Rules of Debate

The Forum Guidelines will be in effect at all times.

Time Limits

Debaters have up to one week to respond after moderators post their assessments of the previous response. There is nothing hard and fast about a one week limit, and requests for more time made by email to Admin or by posting to this thread will be honored unless it becomes too much a habit.
Any debater who disappears with no notice for more than two weeks will be deemed the loser by default.

Judging the Debate

Points will be awarded in this manner:
  1. Substantive point advanced: +1
  2. Substantive point rebutted: -1
  3. Guidelines violation: -1
Note that it is possible to have a negative score.
Like the legal system here in the US, the moderators are not on a quest for truth. Rather, they are seeking to assess the relative merits of the arguments presented by the debaters.

Ending the Debate

The debate will consist of 10 posts by each side. Whoever is ahead at the end of 20 total posts is deemed the winner of the debate. The debate may be extended by mutual agreement.
[Change comment thread title from text to a link. --Admin]
[Add information about time limits. --Admin]
[This message has been edited by Admin, 11-20-2003]

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024