HI DC,
I think that the Flood stories are designed to show YWHW flexing a little divine muscle. There would be no point in just having a single thought that would wipe out everything on Earth that YWHW wanted to, YWHW’s massive ego could not possibly be satisfied by that.
YWHW (at least in the minds of the authors) needs to show the world what he can do, he needs to display his awesome power to the creations who have become too big for their boots (or sandals). It is a bit like a cheap two penny gangster novelette, after a ‘hit’ there’s always someone left to tell the rest of the mob who it was that kicked their butt, I mean there’s no point in showing how strong you are if no one knows it was you that done the deed.
Exactly the same thing happens with the myth of the ten plagues in Egypt. If YWHW really only wanted the Israelites to be set free and settle in the land of Canaan, then we all know that a god would be able to do this with a single thought. But not the YWHW character, he needs to get all puffed up and full of self-importance, so he shows the non-believers exactly what he can do. Not only does YWHW terrorise the population of Egypt, he hardens the Pharaoh’s heart so the Pharaoh cannot agree to Moses demands, even if he wanted to. So why did YWHW harden Pharaoh’s heart? Well to show off again of course.
On a serious note, although the Flood myths in Genesis are not exactly a straight plagiarising of other near eastern myths, they do have general similarities. The most complete and the best-known of the Babylonian sources is of course the Gilgamesh epic. In this story there are some surprising similarities with the Bible accounts:
Divine causality has decided on the flood.
Only one man and his family are to be saved.
A god gives the revelation that there will be a flood.
A god dictates the construction of the ark.
A god dictates that animals are to be brought aboard the ark.
Birds establish the ending of the flood.
The ark comes to rest on a mountain.
A sacrifice that is pleasing to god finishes off the story.
Some people might take these similarities as proof that there was indeed a flood, but if that were the case, why cant the Bible accounts be taken as proof of the validity of the Gilgamesh Epic? The Gilgamesh Epic is after all, far older than any Bible text we have.
I actually really enjoy teaching the Genesis Flood Story in school, the kids love it and they really like colouring in the pictures of the ark and it’s animals. At least it keeps an ancient folk tale alive, it cant be all bad.
Brian.