Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,900 Year: 4,157/9,624 Month: 1,028/974 Week: 355/286 Day: 11/65 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Definition of the Modern Synthesis
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5061 days)
Posts: 3428
From: Ithaca,NY, USA
Joined: 12-20-2001


Message 22 of 22 (1134)
12-22-2001 11:43 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Percy
03-10-2001 4:34 PM


Replying as per "I think the whole issue...so when you say this:", it is true that by accepting species selection (unconditionally) strictly following Huxley, 'disparate' bio-theory can be "synthesized" by moderns whether in or out molecular biology but the dynamic blending of protocols (whole sciences or not) no matter the principle investigator all spell out as far as a common biology posses one space time and form. Before describing and explaining this property in more detail please see my postings on the ICR Forum to interchange about meaning of "information"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Percy, posted 03-10-2001 4:34 PM Percy has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024