Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 67 (9049 total)
28 online now:
kjsimons, nwr (2 members, 26 visitors)
Newest Member: Wes johnson
Upcoming Birthdays: Astrophile
Post Volume: Total: 887,597 Year: 5,243/14,102 Month: 164/677 Week: 23/26 Day: 5/6 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Using the Bible as fact...
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 111 of 113 (628639)
08-11-2011 4:45 PM
Reply to: Message 110 by kowalskil
08-11-2011 3:18 PM


Hello Ludwik,

If you click on the name of the person in the post you replied to, you can find their posting history and see that they haven't posted here in 3.5 years.

Also, if you type:

[qs]"How can anyone argue using the Bible (or any other holy book) as fact when;
a) They can't provide evidence that there is a god of any sort."[/qs]

Then it will look like:

"How can anyone argue using the Bible (or any other holy book) as fact when;
a) They can't provide evidence that there is a god of any sort."

"qs" means "quote, shaded". The "[qs]" goes at the beginning of what you want quoted and the "[/qs]" part goes at the end.

Bible is a book, not a fact.

To "use a book as fact" means that they're accepting what is written in the book as being factual. Its not a claim that the book, itself, can be considered a fact.

What kind of "evidence" do you want? God is spiritual entity.

I suppose repeatable empirical evidence would be what is wanted.

How do you know that God is spiritual entity?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 110 by kowalskil, posted 08-11-2011 3:18 PM kowalskil has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021