Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What is to be taken literally?
MonkeyBoy
Inactive Member


Message 25 of 81 (157661)
11-09-2004 2:01 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by Proboscis
11-08-2004 1:39 PM


From what Jesus said, he was either the Lord, a liar, or a crazy dude.
He also could have been delusional (perhaps he actually believed he was the saviour) or several other things. The exclusion of one idea does not automatically mean that its opposite is true; there are generally many alternatives. This christian absolutism is self defeating.
I think if you read the Bible, it's obvious to pick out which parts are historical and which ones are to be taken figuratively. God made everyone with good judgement skills.
So obvious in fact, that there is only one christian denomination, not several thousand.
If you don't accept Genesis, you obviously just want to believe in Evolution just so you can "fit in" with some of the most influencial scientists in the country.
Yes, I hang out with S. Hawking every weekend. This is what I meant above; if a person does not subscribe to your literal interpretation of Genesis, then in your mind he/she is automatically an unbeliever. What about the people that believe in the christian god and science? Or believe in any god and science?
Aside from your advice on using common sense, since I do not possess any, how can I determine which parts of the bible are literal nad which are figurative?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Proboscis, posted 11-08-2004 1:39 PM Proboscis has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024