Supporting life aboard the ark

Forever, let's hope.(I am herp for those that did not know) Give me a link to Woodmarappe and I'll be happy to delve into the issue somewhat beyond what I have done on the ARK.I had started to review Young's book which clearly attempted to argue against Young Earth Creationism and i was getting ready to "cash" in on his misuse of the entire field of biogoegraphy to discuss the geology of the Newark Supergroup to which flat land I grew up on including the history of Numbers'Creationists but never found that the plusiblity was even high enough to post even to talk0rgings style c/e boards so I left it behind. It is true that Gould's claim to scaling to geology changes the writing of such a bit but that is NEVER reason to "ban" a person. Why dont you Rhain send me a personal e-mail and explain why you would even "think" such. I certinly FOUND OUT what LUX had been saying and THAT IS VALUE enough for even an administrator as if I were one to asses. It can not be that you object to "Seeing" what I write. The claim to science is clear and has less to do within this thread (Mendel Observed Boscovichian Impenetrability in a Mass of Molecular Biology). I would use THAT KNOWLEDGE to comment on views about the ARK and its husbandry taking into HISTORICAL consideration the different uses of latidue and longitude geographically TO ANY AVAILABLE GEOLOGICAL CORRELATION. If the issue comes back to organisms (aka fossils naming horzions I can not loose), if it stays in the volcano I still have a little bit of research do to about the difference of what I call "topographic leveling" in promoting the use reverse genetic engineering by water balance massed in terms of soil displacment either from the Ocean Floor to the Mountain Tops but I have never found this much interest in the Biosphere data project and Gould simply left this for standard science of the comparing large bodies of water with the "bugs" that are coherent with them. Please reach me at bsmcfall@hotmail.com if you need.

You guys are really in the dark matter on this one. I exist. I simply can read what others have not seen. In English we all use 26 letters.I have NEVER admitted WHO Sumac at True Seekers ALREADY SPOKE WITH AT CU. That is where and how that rumor started. Richard Boyd was largerly responsible as far as what I do know about how HE had been able to teach a line between two points WIHOUT recognizing the view of the void of Boscovich. That cause me no problem but it has taken some time to figure out what to "do" with LOGIC. I simply wanted to study some herpetology and I was paying the bill I advise you NOT to take this advice from CU for a decade latter it as well as my persona non gratis has evaporated. Feel free to understand.It seems to me that you all are NOT talking about geology and the Ark but about me and I had tesitified IN TAPE that I AM NOT GOD. Please get over it.

I would have talked about the husbandary of cells on the basis OF NOAH and not some DEATH BEHIND any cell-death in the part of organisms that by anthoer drop leads towards some special vs general revelation but I was trying no matter the planent to remain with a THEORY and this may indeed requrie a bit of spirt and not simply the rupture of any collection not yet made. I have always looked at the ARK creatures as a means to discuss this kind of veternarinism but to be wothwhile the theology would have lead to some where not simply to a showing of how the word intussumption may have become intusception. I dont know. you didnt need that many words as you see I have it in terms of letters.

Again, you prove you were talking about me or some other "incoherent" poster and hence you were not even talking about GOD so please as I admit not talking enough about the geology and the flood please lets get this party started somewhere else. I think the admin is correct. And please stop putting me into you(r) other mix I am not a robot and I do know from what I get the power to speak.[This message has been edited by Brad McFall, 05-09-2003]