The model is irrelevent, the treatment (attitude) of the models is not. If you read carefully, you'll see that I spoke about the treatment of the model and drew parallel to the treatment of the current model.
So, you want us to compare the treatment of two different models without discussing
what those models are, and whether or not they're any good?
"The model", you say, "is irrelevant".
Might we also compare the very different
treatment which has been meted out to the theses that 2 + 2 = 4 and 2 + 2 = 22? But without, of course, considering the two models themselves; and their strengths and weaknesses.
That would be "irrelevant".
™ Version 4.2