Argument from incredulity won't work over here on the science side.
No one objects to any belief you might personally hold. You are free to believe 2 + 2 = 5 all day long.
However, in your OP you present Chirality as a poblem. In response I present not one, not two, not three, not four, not five but six different all natural methods that would account for what we see.
QED, there is no Recurrent Problem of Chirality, no need for some ID mechanism.
Aslan is not a Tame Lion