Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,904 Year: 4,161/9,624 Month: 1,032/974 Week: 359/286 Day: 2/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Hypocritical Leviticus
Blue Jay
Member (Idle past 2727 days)
Posts: 2843
From: You couldn't pronounce it with your mouthparts
Joined: 02-04-2008


Message 10 of 36 (459474)
03-07-2008 9:08 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by jaywill
03-07-2008 5:53 PM


jaywill writes:
Cain, a child of Adam and Eve, married in another female child descendent of Adam and Eve. What is the big deal?
The big deal is, in fact, incest, as the OP stated.
jaywill writes:
He begat more sons and daughters. And they in turn were marrying and begetting sons and daughters.
Cain's wife in the land of Nod is no cause to scratch our heads in bewilderment.
You do realize that this doesn't actually constitute proof of anything, right? The Bible doesn't actually state anywhere that Adam and Eve were the only ones created, nor does it actually state that Cain's wife was Adam and Eve's daughter. Under this logic, your interpretation of the Bible story is just as subjective and unfounded as Chiroptera's.
I agree with you when you say this:
jaywill writes:
It is perculiar to me how some people seem prone to make errors in their comprehension of the Scripture.
I don't agree with your spelling of "peculiar," though.
I would actually render it thus:
Bluejay writes:
It is peculiar to me how most people seem prone to make errors in their comprehension of the Scripture.
And most of them live their entire lives not realizing that their interpretation is completely wrong.

There was a point to this [post], but it has temporarily escaped the chronicler's mind. -modified from Life, the Universe and Everything, Douglas Adams

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by jaywill, posted 03-07-2008 5:53 PM jaywill has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by jaywill, posted 03-08-2008 7:48 AM Blue Jay has not replied

  
Blue Jay
Member (Idle past 2727 days)
Posts: 2843
From: You couldn't pronounce it with your mouthparts
Joined: 02-04-2008


Message 11 of 36 (459476)
03-07-2008 9:33 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by rpiccola808
03-02-2008 4:16 PM


Biblical Genetics
rpiccola808 writes:
Keeping this is in mind, and taking into account that the Bible is theoretically the inerrant word of God, how do you explain the fact that the information in the Bible leaves no avenue for belief outside the notion that Adam and his descendants would have had to reproduce with each other in order to keep populating the world?
I think there's a genetics basis that can account for this, at least as long as you don't mind Ken Ham's slander on answersingenesis.org. Here is an article about the "Creationist" viewpoint on biodiversity, of which I find this quote to be particularly telling:
quote:
In contrast, creationists, starting from the Bible, believe that God created different kinds of organisms, which reproduced ”after their kinds’. Each of these kinds was created with a vast amount of information. There was enough variety in the information in the original creatures so their descendants could adapt to a wide variety of environments.
Read the rest of the article for a bunch of other stuff: it gets richer. Basically, Ken (and at least one sect of creation-"scientists") believes that God created the earth and everything in it in perfect form, and we have deteriorated through time because of Original Sin. He believes this correlates to a decrease in genetic variation. Whereas we now have ~20,000 genes in our DNA, Adam and Eve had dozens, perhaps hundreds or more times as much, and it has been dispersed throughout the human race now by depravity and intermarriage.
It wouldn't be too much of a stretch to say that incest wouldn't be considered a sin if it didn't cause inbreeding depression and contribute to the deterioration of the "perfect" human gene pool. Now that our gene pool is thinned out, however, incest is bad for the human race as a whole, so God has forbidden it.

There was a point to this [post], but it has temporarily escaped the chronicler's mind. -modified from Life, the Universe and Everything, Douglas Adams

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by rpiccola808, posted 03-02-2008 4:16 PM rpiccola808 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024