Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What is the Song of Solomon?
sl33w
Member (Idle past 5762 days)
Posts: 53
Joined: 05-23-2008


Message 8 of 53 (473684)
07-01-2008 8:48 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by Wordswordsman
10-06-2002 8:35 AM


Song of Solomon = Pornography
1) The obssession with "breast, navel, joint of the thigh, my hole" should convince anyone that it is pornography.
2) It is also apocryphal.
Eshter and Song of Solomon contain none of the names of God.
F.F. Bruce, "Canon," wrote that many, both Jews and Christians, believed these two books were apocryphal.
3) John 21.23-25 is also Atheism. Jesus said that he (John) would remain until I come, vs 22. Then vss 23-25 explained that Jesus lied.
sl33w

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Wordswordsman, posted 10-06-2002 8:35 AM Wordswordsman has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by jaywill, posted 07-05-2008 8:42 AM sl33w has replied

  
sl33w
Member (Idle past 5762 days)
Posts: 53
Joined: 05-23-2008


Message 13 of 53 (474122)
07-05-2008 2:45 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by jaywill
07-05-2008 8:42 AM


Re: Song of Solomon = Pornography
To the little "captive", Jaywiil
1) You cannot speak without reciting the "blasphemies of the Beast (Papacy)".
Why do you persist in repeating the "exposed" lies of the Beast.
Quote: "to the pure all things are pure."
That sure leaves you out. The word, "church" is not in the Bible! But you seem fascinated with it.
"The throne of the God and of the Lamb is in Her (New Jerusalem)" - Rev 22.3
A)The God and the Lamb founded New Jerusalem, the kingdom of God on earth, and in heaven.
B) The Papacy founded the church.
C) "Outside the dogs and the sorcerers and the fornicators and the murderers and the idolaters and all of the [ones] loving and dong a lie" - Rev 22.15.
And your reply contained many lies. Besides that you are guilty of "unrighteous judgment and slander."
D) You insinuated that you know that I am wrong because I have a dirty mind. But then, you presented no proof that I was wrong on a single statement. Your name-calling is similar to the Pharisees slandering Iesous because they could not withstand His teaching.
Iesous taught "judge not" (Mt 7.1), and again, "do judge" (Mt 7.15).
I will share with you my understanding of the matter.
A) Mt 7.1 was about thinking that you have the power equal to God, to judge thoughts (as you claimed the power to read my dirty mind).
B) Mt 7.15 is about judging the external things, such as words and deeds (as I have judged your deed of reciting the blasphemies of the Beast/Papacy).
C) Your defense of Song of Solomon did not address any of the "dirty" words.
D) Your denial of F.F. Bruce had no documentation.
E) Your denial of Atheism in John 21.23-25 was word-for-word from the Pope. This fact is historically documented. Do you ever read any other history, other than from the Pope?
You are obssessed with, "Speculative Theoogy."
You are incensed against, "The word of the God."
You are on the losing side!
But the Extremely Loving (agape)), and merciful God of all allows men to change. You do not need to remain a loser with the Pope.
sl33w

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by jaywill, posted 07-05-2008 8:42 AM jaywill has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by jaywill, posted 07-06-2008 8:38 AM sl33w has replied

  
sl33w
Member (Idle past 5762 days)
Posts: 53
Joined: 05-23-2008


Message 15 of 53 (474232)
07-07-2008 12:27 AM
Reply to: Message 14 by jaywill
07-06-2008 8:38 AM


Re: Song of Solomon = Pornography
I cannot communicate with jaywill because of our different languages.
1) I "speak as words of God" - 1Pet 4.11.
2) jaywill speaks substituting pagan words (usually from the Papacy)for the words of God.
Church Lies
I. “Iesous” (977 times).
1) The NKJV Greek English Interlinear NT, Thomas Nelson, 1994, Mt 3.15, p. 8, “Iesous.”
2) The Interlinear Bible, 1994, Trinitarian Bible Society, Mt 3.15, p. 7, “Iesous.”
3) Strong’s Concordance, 1895, Greek word #2424, “Iesous.”
4) Young’s Analytical Concordance, 1874, p. 541, “Iesous.”
5) The Latin Vulgate, Jerome, AD 405, “Iesous” corrupted to read, “Iesus.”
6) Geneva Bible, 1599. Mt 3.15, “Iesus.”
7) 1611 Edition, “To the Most High and Mightie Prince, Iames by the grace of God”, p/ 6 (of unnumbered front pages); Mt 1.1, ”Iesus.”
8*) Rheims NT, Revised 1749, Mt 3.15, p. 5, “Jesus.” NOTE: This was the earliest Bible translation with the letter, “J” and with the name “Jesus.” All names beginning with the letter, “I” (such as “Iesous”) were changed to the letter, “J” in the NT. All names beginning with the letter “Y” were changes to names beginning with the letter “J” in the OT.
II. “Anointed” (490 times).
“Christos”, translated, “Anointed,” was corrupted to read, “Christ” by the writers of the Papacy.
III. “From Calling” (114 times).
“From Calling” (ek klesia) was corrupted to read, “church,” in Old English (AD 1100 - AD 1400).
Every time “Jaywill” opens his mouth, he lies against the Living God and the Living Word of the God.
That is a lot of continuos lying on his part.
When I was young (before 50 years of age), I kept my mouth shut, and you can learn a lot like that. When the mouth is in action, the learning process is impossible.
sl33w

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by jaywill, posted 07-06-2008 8:38 AM jaywill has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by Archer Opteryx, posted 07-07-2008 8:14 AM sl33w has not replied

  
sl33w
Member (Idle past 5762 days)
Posts: 53
Joined: 05-23-2008


Message 19 of 53 (474878)
07-11-2008 8:45 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by jaywill
07-08-2008 9:33 AM


Mixing OT and NT
Reply to: Jaywill
Revelation is the only book in the Bible with the "everlasting good message" (Rev 14). This means the New Covenant.
The apostles wrote during the Old Coveant, see: 1Cor 9.20-21.
Jaywill has mxed OT and NT as though they are one. This is from the Pope and the First Dark Ages (AD 500-1000).
sl33w

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by jaywill, posted 07-08-2008 9:33 AM jaywill has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by Brian, posted 07-13-2008 4:36 AM sl33w has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024