Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is there more than one definition of natural selection?
Hawks
Member (Idle past 6177 days)
Posts: 41
Joined: 08-20-2006


Message 20 of 302 (392214)
03-29-2007 8:56 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by Fosdick
03-29-2007 5:30 PM


quote:
Hoot Mon wrote:
I think all "traits" are genetically determined characteristics.
If only things were as simple. Unfortunately, even genetically identical organisms in identical environments can have different phenotypes. For example, the lac operon possessed by some bacteria includes a heritable epigenetic switch that determines whether or not the organism in which it resides will be able to utilize lactose (i.e. the trait) as a source of energy. If you have the (intact) lac operon you have the potential to metabolize lactose. Thing is, your ability to do so will depend on whether or not your "parent" left the switch in the on position or not (i.e. it's heritable). So, you could find yourself in the situation where you are in a lactose rich environment and you still won't be able to metabolize lactose EVEN THOUGH your genetically identical "sibling" sitting 5 micrometres to your left might be able to.
PLEASE NOTE: the lac operon is bacterial and when I wrote "you" above it implies that "you" are a bacterium (and I'm not claiming that you are Hoot Mon). Confused yet?
Edited by Hawks, : possessor of lac operon added.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Fosdick, posted 03-29-2007 5:30 PM Fosdick has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024