|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: a graph for borger to explain | |||||||||||||||||||
Mammuthus Member (Idle past 6504 days) Posts: 3085 From: Munich, Germany Joined: |
quote: ****** Good one
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Mammuthus Member (Idle past 6504 days) Posts: 3085 From: Munich, Germany Joined: |
quote: ***************** Yes you are both wrong and niether of you understand random mutation. Glad we cleared that up finally.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Mammuthus Member (Idle past 6504 days) Posts: 3085 From: Munich, Germany Joined: |
quote: ****************** No Fred, enlighten me with your thus far non-apparent wisdom of mutation mechanisms. Here is a Dloop from an individual from China, where will all the pre-adaptive non-random mutations occur exactly? You cannot answer, do YOU know why? 1 ttctttcatg gggaagcaga tttgggtacc acccaagtat tgactcaccc atcaacaacc61 gctatgtatt tcgtacatta ctgccagcca ccatgaatat tgtacggtac cataaatact 121 tgaccacctg tagtacataa aaacccaatc cacatcaacc cccccccccc atgcttacaa 181 gcaagtacag caaccaaccc tcaactatca cacatcaact gcaactccaa agccacccct 241 cacccactag gataccaaca aacctaccca cccttaacag tacatagtac ataaagccat 301 ttaccgtaca tagcacatta cagtcaaatc ccttctcgcc cccatggatg acccccctca
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Mammuthus Member (Idle past 6504 days) Posts: 3085 From: Munich, Germany Joined: |
quote: ***********************Peter, by now it should be clear that nobody but you see's your "non-randomness" as anything but your pet definition of a well known phenomenon coupled with your lack of understanding what random means. That you now admit you do not know when the mutation will occur at a given site, coupled with the fact that mutations by the SAME mechanisms occur outside of hotspots, outside of C-T transitions, and in nonsynonymous positions, you have done nothing but give a silly term to a known molecular process that in no way violates the principles of molecular evolution. You don't even know WHERE the next mutation will occur in a gene much less when regardless of the probabiltiy of it being at a C to T transition. Yet you persist in claiming you have identified some new phenomenon...so if you find it annoying that nobody is accepting this nonesense take comfort in the rest of us being annoyed at having to constantly listen to this nonesense from you. A gene under intense selection or a gene near a gene under intense selection where it cannot escapte the selection by recomination is highly stable and thus both show little variation...how is does this refute evolution and provide evidence of morphogenetic fields, creatons, or any other nonesense? You clearly do not undertand population genetics or the underlying basic genetics as you have made clear you don't beleive that populations reduced to few individuals show less variation than large populations with large effective populations. Show the deterministic mutations in 1G5 or in the mtDNA sequences as discussed. You have not thus far been able to do so. Cheers,M
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Mammuthus Member (Idle past 6504 days) Posts: 3085 From: Munich, Germany Joined: |
quote:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Mammuthus Member (Idle past 6504 days) Posts: 3085 From: Munich, Germany Joined: |
Scrolling through this thread I see you also ducked Monkenstick's question as well as mine.....perhaps if you are smelling a read herring you should check your upper lip for the remains of your odd lunch. It is clear you rather make unsupportable statments rather than addressing the questions....so where again are the mutations going to occur in the HV1 region Mr. Nonrandom? If it is so obvious surely this should be an easy question to answer....
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Mammuthus Member (Idle past 6504 days) Posts: 3085 From: Munich, Germany Joined: |
quote: ********************** Well, if it is so obvious then please demonstrate non-random mutation. And if you are claiming that non-random mutation is a non falsifiable hypothesis then you have successfully proved your permanent residency in fantasyland
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Mammuthus Member (Idle past 6504 days) Posts: 3085 From: Munich, Germany Joined: |
FW:
As for my stand on non-random mutations, see Messages 44, 59 from July in molecular genetic proof against random mutation. To summarize, the primary purpose of my entry into that thread was to defend Peter’s claim that discovery of such mutations falsify the current NDT paradigm, and I provided a quote from leading NDT advocate Dr Futuyma proving it. I stated that I believe there is evidence for non-random mutations, but nothing to hang one’s hat on (Transposons for one have all the appearance of being a non-random, pre-programmed type of mutation). I also once believed non-random mutations would explain Haldane’s Dilemma as it applies to rapid diversification since a flood 5K years ago, but backed off this observation as later personal studies of the dilemma demonstrated that rapid diversification could easily occur without the aid of non-random mutations. M: Out of curiosity, what specifically made you back off of the non-random mutation idea? What were the "personal studies"? Peter in no way has backed off of the non-random mutation hypothesis of his so why do you disagree that it is unecessary? He claims it is a falsification of NDT but you seem to have different criteria. Care to explain? FW:Page nevertheless continues to quote statements of mine that I have backed off of (messages 44 & 59 are proof of this, in case Page denies I never told him). This is like those dishonest atheists who will use quotes of Abraham Lincoln before he was a Christian in their attempt to show he was not Christian! M: Aha, agenda exposed. You are yet another christian bigot. Big surprise there. You probably have never even met an atheist yet feel you are such a wonderful superior ubermensch that you can judge us all. FW:For now, I’m on the sidelines watching the drama play out. I pop into this drama now and then mostly to expose erroneous statements or bad logic like Mamuthus's "good one" in this thread. M: It was a good one. And you have not supported your position. But don't feel bad, Borger is much smarter than you and has not had any success with his various lines of reasoning either
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024