What i think may be coming revealing is that unlike evolution by descent that necessarily concieves to a taxogeny from a common lineage it is the baraminologist who can relize a larger number of laws of growth (if these exist IN ADDTION TO SELECTIOn as Darwin thought "may be")per any orthoganal data base of the evidence.
Let it be as it were.
I have been able to clearly seperate (in my mind) growth and development which I had only been able in the past to so isolate from reference to acual herpetological examples. The seperation could be as false as for instance however : vicariance, displacement currents, electrotonic size. I do not know. But I thought therefore biologically I was.
™ Version 4.2