What is Salty's 'semi-meiotic hypothesis'

A couple of extra points that seme to be important.Firstly chromosomal rearrangement is proposed to be the mechanism to produce macroevolution. Mutations to Hox genes have been demonstrated to produce macromutations - but chromosmal rearrangement has not. So there is no real evidence for this hypothesis.The use of chromosomal rearrangements adds to a known problem of "hopeful monsters" - where does the "monster" find a mate. To solve this it is proposed that all ancestral species reproduced asexually. Needless to say there is no real evidence for this.The additional problem of "hopeful monsters" - that slow refinement works more reliable than large jumps in "phenotype space" is answered by proposing directed evolution. For which there is no real evidence.On this basis alone the semi-meiotic hypothesis seesm to be a very unpromising piece of speculation, far inferior to the theory that it is supposed to replace.

Despite your false claim that I have "obviously" not read your writings you have no substantive rebuttal.Obviously you need to rely on personal attacks rather than deal with the facts.