Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,890 Year: 4,147/9,624 Month: 1,018/974 Week: 345/286 Day: 1/65 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   more evidence for shared ancestry (NOT similarity)
Joe T
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 41
From: Virginia
Joined: 01-10-2002


Message 8 of 34 (18740)
10-01-2002 2:59 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Tranquility Base
09-30-2002 9:29 PM


quote:
Originally posted by Tranquility Base:
Hi SLPx
Why not similarity?
Are you forgetting what our claim is? We believe God created these genomes (that have drifted since). Why shouldn't physiologically simlar organims have simlar genomes and chromosomal arrangement? Your 'must haves' are simply assumptions.
God could have created the genomes!

Using your reasoning, then should not a whale be more genetically similar to a whale shark than to a hippo? What you've said above is dangerously like a testable prediction of creation. Do you think you can pass the test?
Joe T

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Tranquility Base, posted 09-30-2002 9:29 PM Tranquility Base has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by Tranquility Base, posted 10-01-2002 11:04 PM Joe T has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024